• Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Recent blog posts

 George Orwell had a fine concept of political speech and it's purpose. He's no less right today than he was 60 years ago when he said it, and today's phrases carefully crafted for maximum political effect are no different. Here are three such phrases used to advance the interests of the state at the expense of the people.



1. National Security


National security can occasionally refer to classified military information that could actually threaten the citizenry of the United States. For instance, the codes that activate the US nuclear arsenal should be kept secret for national security reasons. The reasons are clear.

Lately, however, national security has been used as an excuse to keep embarrassing information away from the eyes and ears of the public. Of late, national security has come to mean the political security of state officials. The details of the Benghazi attack, for instance, are being kept secret, but represent no real security issue.


2. Keynesian Economics


Keynesian theory, as practiced these days, is the idea that government knows best and can reverse an economic downturn. In spite of being repeatedly shown to be totally wrong in every way, politicians find the concept of righting economic wrongs with printed money terribly tantalizing, and so Keynesian economics has been taught in state-controlled schools for decades.

The phrase "Keynesian economics" has come to mean "government employees are always right", and that complete control of the monetary system should be ceded to government employees, who in their great wisdom, will elevate us all from poverty. Predictably though, the newly printed money generally finds its way to friends of government, making the well-connected very rich. Not that anyone could have seen that coming.

To use a scientific-sounding term lends legitimacy to the theft writ large that Keynesian theory has come to represent. A more appropriate term would be possibly "state-controlled economics", or "centrally-planned economics", as this is a fairer representation of what is going on. Panels of bureaucrats deciding what the interest rate and money supply ought to be is a frankly Soviet tradition, and is no different from deciding the price of shoes or how much wheat ought to be farmed.


3. Public versus Private


The Cliven Bundy case, where armed agents of the federal government forcibly stole a man's cattle for "trespassing" on so-called public land is an illustration of just how public those lands really are. In this case the Bureau of Land Management had laid claim to the land, and charged rent. People who didn't pay evidently got guns stuck in their faces. Oftentimes, "public" goods are treated as the personal property of the state employees that administer them, even though they are forcibly funded by the public at large.

A better term might be "state-controlled" and "citizen-controlled". For instance, "public housing" has a friendly sound to it; one would like to imagine that anyone could live there free of charge. Calling something "public" tends to hide the cost, as state-controlled entities use taxpayer money to avoid charging door fees.

"Public schools" have a welcoming sound, while "private schools" sound closed off and elitist.

The truth of the matter is that a public school, far from being a creation of a community for the benefit of its children, is a state-controlled entity with increasingly little input from parents. Just take a look at "Common Core", which would more correctly be called the "State-Controlled Curriculum".

To call a fellow a "public" official is often unrepresentative of the truth, as that person is paid by the state and won't generally go to bat for the public. He is a state official, and when push comes to shove, will generally cleave unto the state.


As Confucius said, the beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name. So long as people continue to use the language crafted by the state for its own benefit, the institutions directly opposed to the interests of the people will be protected.

Hits: 287

Posted by on in Uncategorized

The US Dollar, as defined in the Coinage Act of 1792, is defined as about three-fourths of an ounce of silver.

These things that we are paid with today, and use to pay bills are not dollars per se, but rather a piece of scrip printed by the official sounding "Federal Reserve", which is actually a bunch of commercial banks that bribed Congress to let them counterfeit money and loan it to themselves. No, really. Look it up.

It isn't good business to change the name of a gourmet ice-cream when you sell out to Unilever, so likewise the banks  printing the new money didn't use a different name for their faux-money product.

To call one of today's greenbacks a dollar is like calling a mannequin a woman, and so it becomes necessary to call today's "dollars" by their proper name.



  • To call them Federal Reserve Notes lends credence to the banking fraud.
  • To call them Government Scrip makes them sound too official.
  • To call them Clownbux captures perfectly their kinship with Monopoly money, Chuck. E. Cheese tickets, and IOU's from passing vagrants.
  • To refer to the national debt as "17 Trillion Clownbux" cuts it down to its proper level of legitimacy.
  • To say the price is "42 Clownbux" helps everyone realize that maybe a sounder means of exchange is needed.
  • For a salary to be quoted as 70,000 Clownbux a year makes the jobseeker think to renegotiate terms and benefits.
  • It is easier to turn down Clownbux and ask for something else. "No, I don't want Clownbux. Got any ranch dressing?"

To continue to refer to debts and payments as dollars, as if that were a constant and real term, is to support the fraud. To use a different term devoid of sentimentality helps demonstrate how their value is constantly changing (for the worse), and that in time no one will take them seriously.

Furthermore, as nations around the world steal from their citizens by debauching their currencies, the term can be reused. EU Clownbux, Japanese Clownbux, and so on.

Hits: 819

Tired of replacing crappy new stuff constantly? Does it seem like they just can't build anything right anymore? It turns out that it isn't ignorance or incompetence making your stuff break, but a deliberate effort by intelligent people who know exactly what they're doing. It really doesn't have to be this way, and manufacturers can make equipment that lasts ten or a hundred times as long without breaking a sweat. Here are three well-known secrets that manufacturers would prefer you didn't know.


1. Most Stuff Can Actually Last Forever

Your ladle broke. It's time to get a new one. The steel handle just snapped right in half after a few years of use. Surely if they made the ladle twice as thick, it would last twice as long, right?

Wrong. It might actually last forever. All mechanical engineers are taught in school about how you can bend something back and forth only so many times, and then it will break. If you apply enough stress, the spoon (or beam, or coffee maker) will break right away, but over time metal fatigue sets in, cracks develop, and after a million cycles of being used, an item will break. Here's that chart:


Sure enough, the less you stress something out, the more "cycles" you can get out of it. With less and less stress on the material, you can get more scoops, or cups of coffee, or whatever. However, with steel, you've got something called an "endurance limit", where it doesn't matter anymore. The number of cycles goes to infinity. You can scoop, and scoop and scoop with that ladle if it is made thick enough, and it will literally never break. It may wear completely down to a nub before that handle snaps.

And, looking at the difference between a two year spoon (10,000 cycles) and a forever spoon, you're only talking about a tiny bit more strength, and tiny bit more material. So, for what might be an almost unnoticeable amount of weight and expense, you can get pots and pans, spoons, coffee makers and truck springs that last forever. But, the engineers that determine the exact thickness and strength of components are acting under specific instructions to make things last a certain length of time, rather than producing the best product. The failure is planned and scheduled into the DNA of the product. This is called planned obsolescence, and its a scam that's been running since about 1950.

2. Car Engines Could Easily Last a Million Miles

There are car engines today that have lasted millions of miles. Most big-rig engines last millions of miles. Once again, there is no puzzle out of reach to modern science preventing cars from driving millions of miles routinely. Average industrial equipment is expected to last for at least ten years of continuous operation, which is equivalent to around 80,000 hours. If a car engine lasted 80,000 hours at 30 miles an hour, it would go 2.4 million miles.

The fact of the matter is that engines don't actually have to wear out ever. It is not only possible, but actually quite easy to design moving parts that experience essentially zero wear and will last tens of thousands of hours. With clean oil of good quality, parts will float on a film of oil and never touch.


Once oil is contaminated, billions of particles of grit work to wear down engine parts. Oil changes do very little to remove this grit once it is in there, and oil filters fail to remove it effectively enough to prevent wear. Furthermore, cars are designed with insufficient oil capacity. Thus, we have engines that fail after 5000 hours instead of 80,000 or more. Engineers have been making equipment last ten times as long as cars for over 100 years, and there is no reason your car needs to die after 200,000 miles. Once again, engineers have been given specific instructions to defy their instincts and training, and create a device designed to fail.

3. Lead-Free Solder is Killing You and Your Products

It may seem like removing lead from solder (and thusly electronic devices) might be a good thing, and if you are eating solder or cell phones, it definitely is. However, lead-free solder used to assemble everything from car electronics to cell phones has a strong tendency to grow what are called "tin whiskers". These tiny, conductive filaments of tin literally grow right out of the solder joints holding wires and electronic components together, and once they get long enough, the device shorts out. That doesn't sound so bad, unless you're driving a Toyota and suddenly you start accelerating out of control.


Aside from making everyone buy new stuff every few years, planned obsolescence can be downright dangerous. A couple-year lifespan is perfect for maximizing sales, and lead-free solder has been embraced with open arms by most manufacturers. It should be telling that the US military won't use it. Electrical engineers are well aware of this phenomenon and how it can lead to catastrophic failure. Once again, an intentionally poor manufacturing technique has been foisted on the public, and as electronics laden with every other heavy metal (besides lead) stack up in landfills everywhere, the environmental benefit is basically nil.

Hits: 3239

Posted by on in Uncategorized

Bitcoin was started in 2009 as open-source software for the secure, anonymous trading of purely digital "currency" called Bitcoins. By late 2013, the price of a Bitcoin in US dollars had gone from basically zero to around 1200 dollars. Many assumed that Bitcoin would become the world currency and replace all existing currencies, given the rate of growth. Unfortunately for the hopefuls, Bitcoins have somewhat stabilized at around $600.

However, since the software was open-source, everyone and his brother copied, pasted, changed and renamed their own "cryptocurrencies" that were functionally identica to Bitcoin. At the time of this writing there were 192 different currencies being traded and tracked, and no doubt hundreds or thousands more hadn't yet seen the light of day.

At some point during this article, you've got to go to coinmarketcap.com and see what I'm talking about. The website is a roster of all the major cryptocurrencies, tracking growth, volume and market cap for each one.

So what is the value of a Bitcoin when there are hundreds of billions of functionally identical "coins" floating around by different names? As time goes on they will all be equally acceptable and exchangeable, as Namecoins or Dogecoins can be traded for Litecoins or Bitcoins.

I predicted during the boom times in November of 2013 that Bitcoin would maintain an early adopters advantage, but ultimately the value of all cryptocurrencies would approach zero as there was no limit to how many could be produced.

An emerging pattern on coinmarketcap.com is the reduction in relative importance of Bitcoin in terms of trading volumes. Yes, Bitcoin is still king, but it only represents 57 percent of total trading value, down from 100% when they were the only kid on the block. Where does this end? What if Bitcoin only represents 2-3% of trading volume? What would happen to the price? What would happen to the price of other coins?

Ultimately, equilibrium will be reached. But, what is equilibrium? Presumably if there is no advantage between "coins", all coins will be worth the same. But what does a "coin" mean if they can be divided into infinitely tiny parts and there are an infinite number of coins? Isn't zero the only rational valuation of something with an infinite supply?


As much as everyone likes the convenience of cryptocurrencies, and as much as people have invested in them, it seems impossible to believe that the entire technology, given its raging success so far, could collapse into nothingness. But, many other currencies all over the world, despite the protests of everyone holding them, have gone to zero because of exploding supply. Certainly, one cryptocurrency multiplying into 192 in a few years qualifies as an increase in supply.

Hits: 863

When it comes to home defense, a gun only works when you're holding it and its pointed in the right direction. That's awfully specific. A pit bull on the other hand, can protect a home with a couple barks, and unlike a gun they're always "on". So what is a pit bull?


"Pit bull" is the name applied to a large collection of fighting dog breeds that have a certain appearance. They have short hair, muscular chests and a characteristic double-hump of bulging jaw muscles on top of their heads.

Pit bulls are widely misunderstood, and one must understand the dog's history to understand the dog. Originally bred for fighting, these dogs retain a puzzling tolerance for pain, a joyful, unrestrained relentlessness, and extreme protectiveness of their families. They are agile, fearless, and very curiously, have bulletproof heads. This takes us to our first item.

1. Your Gun Won't Take a Bullet for You.


Hero Pit Bull Survives Being Shot in the Head

Pit Bull Puppy Survives Being Buried Alive and Shot Twice in the Head

Brave Pit Bull Survives Four Bullets While Defending Owner

Virginia Beach Pit Bull Takes a Bullet to the Head, Scares off Robbers

There's four stories, and there are many more. This phenomenon is not anecdotal, or miraculous, it is evidently quite common. People shoot pit bulls in the head, figuring that will be enough to put the dog down. But the pit bull keeps on coming. While a bullet to the head is discouraging to most, a pit bull sees it as a challenge.

2. You Can "Open Carry" your Pit Bull Without Issues


Could you walk around the neighborhood strapped up with AK-47's? Would the police wish to question you? No problem with a pit bull. Now everybody knows you've got one at the house, and if your sleazy neighbor was casing your apartment, he just stopped. This takes us to our next point.

3. Your Pit Bull Can't be Used Against Youb2ap3_thumbnail_3Pitbull.jpg

People say you're more likely to have your guns used against you than you are to use one against an attacker. Pit bulls aren't like this. Unlike a baseball bat, gun or knife, the pit bull knows the difference between his good guys and the bad guys.

4. Your Gun isn't Alert 24/7 with Incredible Hearing


One creaking floorboard, and the pit bull is on high alert. Food? Intruders? Intruders carrying food? The pit bull has to know. This is where a pit bull and a gun work together. The dog gives you the drop, and you can work together to do the rest.

5. Guns can't give you snuggles.


They just can't. They don't stick their head out the window on car trips either. Your children won't fondly remember the 9mm pistol you had while they were growing up.


Hits: 933