• Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

The Dow Jones has averaged near-zero returns since 1966

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 3090
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print
Let's begin with the myth that the stock market has averaged 9 percent returns since forever. Its often quoted as a reason why its almost impossible to lose money if you buy and hold stocks. I disagree, and this article has some pretty basic analysis to show that maybe the stock market isn't so great.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a basket of stocks with some doctoring of the numbers to adjust for dividends, stock splits and so on. Let's see how it did since 1966.

Let's imagine we bought the entire index in form of a mutual fund in 1966, for the low-low price of 950 bucks. I say mutual fund because everyone's 401(k)'s are in mutual funds, so this is primary means that an ordinary person will invest in the stock market.


Wow! So in 46 years, your money went from 950 bucks to almost 13,000! You're rich, right? Well, hang on there a second.

Mutual funds frequently charge about 1% annual fees, and you will pay taxes on that $12,000 gain, but only in the year that you sell. Lets assume, in that selling year, that you pay at the capital-gains rate of 15%. So, I reworked the numbers and below is a comparison between the original chart that just shows how the index did, and how your money would have performed under the burden of taxes and fees.


Wow! That's like half of your money just went down the toilet to pay the Feds and the stock brokers. Well, you still did okay, since your 950 dollar investment still went up to like 6500 bucks, right? Well, not so fast, you see, a dollar in 1966 really bought a lot more than it does today. For instance, a deluxe Corvette cost around $4000 dollars. So, I've adjusted for inflation, using government generated statistics that are commonly regarded to be a gross understatement of reality. But, to be as conservative as possible, I used official statistics.


Whoa. Hang on there. That red line is so flat and tiny compared to the huge blue line soaring overhead, I can barely tell if I made money. So lets see that line, all by itself.


That clarifies it. What this graph pretty clearly shows is that from 1966 to the present, investing in the Dow was a money-losing proposition. For the brief dotcom boom of 1996-2000, the stock market was a great deal, more than doubling in real value, AFTER taxes, fees and inflation. Excluding these couple years, though, the stock market has been a money-losing machine for nearly 50 years. In the past 13 years, the market lost 25% of its value between taxes, fees and inflation.

So, I'm not sure where the stock market cheerleaders get their numbers, but mine tell a very different tale.
Richard is an engineer by day, and a political activist by night, fighting would-be totalitarians and government busybodies everywhere.